China Has Withheld Samples of a Dangerous Flu Virus
For over a year, the Chinese government has withheld lab
samples of a rapidly evolving influenza virus from us — specimens needed to develop
vaccines and treatments, consistent with federal health officials.
Despite persistent requests from officialdom and research
institutions, China has not provided samples of the damaging virus, a kind of
bird flu called H7N9.
In the past, such exchanges are mostly routine under rules
established by the planet Health Organization.
Now, because of we and China spar over trade, some scientists
worry that the vital exchange of medical supplies and knowledge could slow,
hampering preparedness for the next biological threat.
The scenario is “unlike shortages in aluminum and soybeans,”
said Dr. Michael Callahan, a communicable disease specialist at Harvard school of
medicine.
“Jeopardizing U.S. access to foreign pathogens and therapies
to counter them undermines our nation’s ability to guard against infections
which may spread globally within days.”
Experts concur that the world’s next global pandemic will
likely come from a repeat offender: the flu. The H7N9 virus is one candidate.
Since taking root in China in 2013, the virus has spread
through poultry farms, evolving into a highly pathogenic strain that will infect humans.
it's killed 40 percent of its victims.
If this strain were to become highly contagious among
humans, seasonal flu vaccines would provide little to no protection. Americans have
virtually no immunity.
“Pandemic influenza spreads faster than anything,” said Rick
A. Bright, the director of Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority,
workplace within the Department of Health and Human Services that oversees
vaccine development.
“There’s nothing to carry it back or slow it down. Every minute
counts.”
Under an agreement established by the planet Health The organization, participating countries must transfer influenza samples with pandemic
potential to designated research centers “in a timely manner.”
That process — involving paperwork, approval through several
agencies and a licensed carrier — normally takes several months, consistent with Dr.
Larry Kerr, the director of pandemics and emerging threats at the Department of Health
and Human Services.
But quite one year after a devastating wave of H7N9
infections in Asia — 766 cases were reported, most in China — the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention is still expecting several viral samples, the National Security
Council and therefore the W.H.O. confirmed.
Scientists at the Department of Agriculture have had such
difficulty obtaining flu samples from China that they need to be stopped requesting them
altogether, consistent with a government official who spoke anonymously because of he
wasn't authorized to debate the matter.
At least four research institutions have relied upon the little group of H7N9 samples from cases in Taiwan and Hong Kong. (All four asked to not be
identified for fear of further straining ties.)
The Chinese embassy in Washington didn't answer multiple
requests for comment.
The Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention also
didn't reply to inquiries regarding the transfer.
When the H7N9 virus first appeared in China, researchers say
the Chinese government at first provided timely information. But communication has
gradually worsened.
Yet a sudden spike in infections during 2016-2017
outbreak wave demands intense the research said scientists getting to understand the
virus’s evolution.
Recent trade tensions could worsen the matter.
The Office of us Trade Representative in April released the proposed list of products to be targeted for tariffs — including
pharmaceutical products like vaccines, medicines, and medical devices.
So far, none of these medical products have landed on the
ultimate tariff lists.
But lower-level trade negotiations with China concluded on Thursday with few
signs of progress, increasing the likelihood of additional tariffs.
Us relies on China not just for H7N9 influenza samples
except for medical supplies, like plastic drip mechanisms for intravenous
saline, also as ingredients for certain oncology and anesthesia drugs.
a number of these
are delivered through a just-in-time production model; there are not any stockpiles, which could
prove dangerous if the supply was disrupted, health officials said.
Scientists believe top commerce officials in both
governments view the viral samples much like the other laboratory product, and perhaps
unacquainted their vital role in global security.
“Countries don’t own their viral samples any longer than
they own the birds in their skies,” said Andrew C. Weber, who oversaw the biological defense
programs at the Pentagon during the Obama administration.
“Given that this flu virus may be a potential threat to
humanity, not sharing it immediately with the global network of W.H.O. laboratories like C.D.C. is
scandalous.
Many could die needlessly if China denies international access to samples.”
For over a decade, epidemiological data and samples are used
as trade war pawns.
China hid the 2002 outbreak of severe acute respiratory
syndrome, or SARS, for four months then kept the findings of its research private.
Some
provinces withheld information about cases even from the central government in Beijing.
In 2005, Chinese authorities insisted H5N1 influenza the outbreak was contained, contradicting the University of Hong Kong scientists who offered
evidence that it had been expanding.
Those authorities hesitated to share viral
samples from infected wild birds with the international community, concealing the scope to
avoid success in their vast poultry industry.
Indonesia followed suit, refusing in 2007 to share specimens
of H5N1 with the United States and therefore the UK, arguing that the countries
would use the samples to develop a vaccine that Indonesians couldn't afford.
Those episodes led to the 2011 development of the W.H.O.’s
Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework, which aims to market sample
exchanges also as developing countries’ access to vaccines.
But for countries like China, bearing the burden of the completely unique virus is paradoxical.
Outbreaks are expensive — the wave of H7N9 infections in
2013 alone cost China more than $6 billion, consistent with the United Nations — but
they will provide a head-start in developing valuable treatments.
0 comments:
Post a Comment