It’s
Not Just Pre-Existing Conditions. Voters Weigh Many Health Issues on State
Ballots
Health
care has been a dominant issue on the campaign trail this fall, with voters
particularly worried about continuing insurance protections for people with pre-existing
medical conditions.
But
on polling day, they're going to decide a variety of other important health
care questions for his or her states through ballot initiatives.
Among
the foremost significant are referendums that might expand Medicaid in Idaho,
Nebraska, and Utah.
If
voters altogether three states approve, an estimated 340,000 additional
low-income adults would be eligible for free of charge health coverage through
the govt program, because the health law allows, starting next year.
But
the ballot questions also cover a good range of other issues: whether to ease
penalties for low-level drug offenders in Ohio; consider a ban on vaping in
indoor workspaces in Florida; and whether to get rid of abortion protections
from state constitutions in Alabama and West Virginia.
Medicaid expansion
In
addition to the ballot questions in Idaho, Nebraska, and Utah, the result of
tight governor’s races in seven states that have thus far resisted expanding
Medicaid could change the equation there.
In
Maine, a win for the Democrat, Janet Mills, would presumably end in a minimum
of 70,000 low-income adults quickly becoming eligible for Medicaid.
Voters
within the state had approved an expansion of the program last year, but the outgoing governor, Paul LePage, a Republican, has blocked it.
Other
states that would see Medicaid expand if Democrats win include Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
In
all, election results could extend Medicaid coverage to 2.7 million additional
Americans, including quite 1,000,000 in Florida alone.
On
the opposite hand, a ballot question in Montana could abruptly end expanded
Medicaid there.
Voters
will decide whether to continue providing it to low-income childless adults
beyond this year by considering a measure that might double the cigarette tax
to buy the state’s share of the value.
The industry has poured quite $17 million into fighting the measure.
Depending
on what percentage states join Virginia, where the legislature voted in May to expand
Medicaid and an estimated 400,000 people will become eligible Jan. 1, the program could see its biggest enrollment growth since 2014 when the Affordable
Care Act first allowed Medicaid expansion.
Abortion
Two
states, Alabama and West Virginia will ask voters whether to amend their state
constitutions to get rid of protections for the proper to abortion or
require the funding of abortions.
The
questions come amid speculation that the newly reconfigured Supreme Court could
overturn Roe v. Wade, allowing each state to make a decision whether to permit
abortion.
In
the more liberal state of Oregon, voters will decide whether to ban public
spending on abortion except when medically necessary or required by federal
law.
If
the initiative is approved, Medicaid would not cover abortions for low-income
women; abortion may additionally not be a covered benefit for state employees.
Soda Taxes
In
Oregon and Washington State, big beverage companies are pushing the ballot
initiatives that might prevent localities from imposing taxes on
sugar-sweetened drinks also as a good range of groceries.
Backed
in large part by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, the measures are a replacement front
within the soda industry’s war on the taxes that health advocates see as an
efficient thanks to decreasing the consumption of sugary beverages — products
that are linked to obesity and a variety of diet-related illnesses.
Opioids and Illegal Drugs
Ohio,
a state hard hit by overdose deaths is asking voters whether drug possession
cases should be prosecuted only as misdemeanors.
The savings from a reduced
inmate population would be used for drug rehabilitation and victims’ aid
programs.
The
Democratic candidate for governor, Richard Cordray, says the measure, which
might amend the state’s constitution, is required not least because The legislature has did not address the opioid crisis in a meaningful way.
But
opponents, among them the judge of the Ohio Supreme Court, some Democrats and
therefore the Republican candidate for governor, Mike DeWine, is concerned
about unintended consequences, including the consequences on the state’s drug
courts, which lean heavily on the threat of incarceration to compel treatment
and drug-free behavior.
The initiative has received considerable out-of-state support, including $1 million
each from foundations travels by George Soros, the billionaire investor and
Democratic donor, and Mark Zuckerberg, the founding father of Facebook.
Tobacco and E-Cigarettes
Tobacco
companies and their products still be a target.
South
Dakota voters are being asked to approve substantial tax increases on
cigarettes and wholesale tobacco goods, with some of the revenue to fund
technical training schools for top school graduates.
The
state, which last raised cigarette taxes in 2006, has among rock bottom such
taxes within the country.
Florida
voters will consider a bundled amendment that seems to be confounding many:
Tucked into an initiative that might ban offshore drilling for oil and gas in
state waters may be a proposal that might extend a longstanding smoking ban in
indoor workplaces to e-cigarettes and vapes.
The passage is uncertain, not only because many citizens don't understand why both
issues should be linked — proponents say they're both environmental topics — but
because, pragmatically speaking, Amendment 9 is near rock bottom of an extended
list of races and questions on the state ballot.
Dialysis Costs
It
may not be a single-payer, but it’s a step toward regulating health care
prices.
California
voters will have the chance to weigh in on a proposition limiting what
proportion dialysis companies can charge private insurers to treat patients
with serious renal disorder.
State
Democrats and labor unions, notably the Service Employees International
Union-United Healthcare Workers West, are backing the proposition aimed toward
the 2 largest dialysis chains, DaVita and Fresenius.
They claim the businesses
are overcharging for his or her care.
Both
the California Medical Association and therefore the California Hospital
Association, also as business groups et al. , are opposed, and quite $100
million has been spent trying to defeat the measure.
They
say the proposition could hurt patients’ ability to urge lifesaving treatment.
Patient Safety
Massachusetts
voters will decide whether hospital nurses should be limited to a group number
of patients, they will look after directly.
The number would range from one to 6, counting on the sort of medical unit or care
needed.
Hospital
groups have strenuously fought the proposal, saying that the value of hiring
enough nurses to satisfy the need would be on the brink of $900 million, with
the burden falling heavily on community hospitals.
The
Massachusetts Nurses Association, the union and professional group that drafted
the question, argues that such limits protect patients and ultimately economize
by reducing hospital stays.
Medical
Marijuana
Two
generally conservative states, Utah and Missouri, will consider proposals to
legalize cannabis products for medicinal use.
The
Missouri ballot question focuses on potentially lucrative tax income, with
voters being asked to settle on among three tax-and-spend proposals, with
recipients including biomedical research, veterans’ health care, infancy
education, and drug treatment.
The
Utah question concentrates on the mechanics of prescribing and possession: If
the referendum is approved, for instance, then patients with medical cards
would be
allowed
to get older to 6 plants, by Jan. 1, 2021.
Other
states are looking beyond medical use. Voters in Michigan and North Dakota face
measures that might legalize recreational marijuana for adults 21 and older.
Sales
Tax Exemptions
Nevada
is poised to become the 10th state to supply nuisance tax exemptions
specifically for feminine hygiene products if voters approve a ballot
initiative there.
Opponents
of eliminating the so-called pink tax say that it could cost the state from $72
million to $104 million annually.
The
state’s voters also are being asked to approve nuisance tax exemptions for
medical equipment like oxygen tanks and ventilators.
0 comments:
Post a Comment